17 Oct 2017 | 06:29am IST
This Diwali, let’s burst with emotion instead
With the Supreme Court implementing a ban on Delhi celebrating Diwali with firecrackers, Café looks closer to home and questions how Diwali could be otherwise celebrated, and whether crackers are even necessary
Fernando Monte da Silva
Diwali is a
symbolic representation of the return
of Rama and Sita to Ayodhya. Conventionally, people would light
lamps in the streets and in homes to symbolise the victory of light over
darkness or good over evil. In more recent years though, there is an increasing
demand for fireworks and crackers, which no doubt have their critics,
especially when it comes to pollution in terms of air and sound. With the air
in New Delhi being among the most polluted of any city in the world, India’s
highest court has taken the initiative to curb matters at least on its own
turf, and has ordered a temporary ban on firecracker sales during Diwali, the
Hindu festival of lights. The court order has angered many people as they
prepare for Diwali, which starts October 19, with some claiming that the order
prevents them from taking part in a local tradition: the lighting of fireworks.
However, this begs the question of whether one can’t get into the festive
spirit without going the firework way.
Shefali Gandhi from
Calangute believes that the lack of fireworks is not a deterrent in the
slightest, and took to social media to outline her plan for Diwali celebrations,
posting “A week before Diwali, keep your car stocked with small boxes of
sweets, chocolates, crayons, small toys, ear-rings or any other small
knick-knacks that can be useful. Gift them to the boys who fill up petrol at
petrol pumps, the old cobbler who sits under a tree in your neighbourhood, the
kids who sell toys/ balloons at traffic signals, the tailor who does your shirt
buttons/trouser alterations, kids who beg on the roads, the lady who sits at
the street side with a wicker basket of fresh vegetables, the people who
collect your trash... smile and wish them a very happy Diwali. The smile that
lights up their faces at your unexpected gesture is more illuminating than a
1000 electric lamps! This Diwali, light a life!”
Kula Sekhar Kantipudi
is an individual who has been propagating firework-free festivities for ages.
Sekhar, as he is popularly known, believes “There can’t really be much of a
compromise on not using fireworks. One has to roll with the times, but embody
the spirit of the festival. The days when fireworks were viable was a time that
the population was half of what it is today, and the pollution levels even less
so. Pollution is a globally pressing issue. There are many things that people
can do to replace the use of fireworks. Diyas and reusable lamps work well for
illumination, and music and dancing definitely help on the front of revelry.”
However, one
reveller, who preferred to remain unnamed before sharing his views, spoke in
favour of not curbing the festive processes, saying “When we were growing up,
Diwali meant a festival that celebrated both light and sound. I can’t imagine a
Diwali without the noise of a bomb somewhere in the vicinity, or the hissing
sound of rockets. During our childhood, no one stopped crackers, because the other
causes were negligible or non-existent. The number of vehicles was tiny, ACs
didn’t exist. Yet, despite people knowing what the real causes are, they do
nothing to clamp down on those, as opposed to these things. Maybe the way
forward is to take measures to limit usage, but an outright ban stymies the fun
involved with the festival.”
Popular author,
Chetan Bhagat has gone on record to say that he does not approve of the Supreme
Court order and feels that the ban on the sale of firecrackers is unnecessary
and says that traditions call for the celebration of Diwali with the bursting
of firecrackers. However, as divisive as he is considered to be, many may
respond that this in itself may be considered proof of it being a good move.
Supporters
of the firecracker ban say the health of New Delhi’s 18-million residents is
more important than traditions, noting that the city’s air can endanger human
health at this time of the year, because of slower winds and colder
temperatures that trap more pollution. When the Indian Supreme Court announced
its decision on Monday, one of the judges said “let’s try at least one Diwali
without firecrackers.” Perhaps it’s not such a bad idea after all. Think about
it for a second. How much does it hurt to try? And if it works, you may even
wind up caring for the environment, the health of those around you, and wind up
having a good time. Sounds like a win-win, really.