15 Sep 2018  |   05:47am IST

SC awards Rs 50 lakh compensation to ex-ISRO scientist in espionage case

Terming the police action against 76-year old Nambi Narayanan as a ‘psycho-pathological treatment’, a bench headed by Chief Justice Dipak Misra said his ‘liberty and dignity’, basic to his human rights, were jeopardised

PTI, NEW DELHI: The Supreme Court today ordered a high-level probe to take the erring cops to task for causing "tremendous harassment" and "immeasurable anguish" to ISRO scientist Nambi Narayanan in the 1994 espionage case and asked the Kerala government to cough up Rs 50 lakh compensation for compelling him to undergo the "immense humiliation".

Terming the police action against 76-year old ex-scientist of Indian Space Research Organisation (ISRO) as a "psycho-pathological treatment", a bench headed by Chief Justice Dipak Misra said his "liberty and dignity", basic to his human rights, were jeopardised as he was taken into custody and, eventually, despite all the glory of the past, was compelled to face "cynical abhorrence". 

"There can be no scintilla of doubt that the appellant, a successful scientist having national reputation, has been compelled to undergo immense humiliation. The lackadaisical attitude of the state police to arrest anyone and put him in police custody has made the appellant to suffer the ignominy.

"The dignity of a person gets shocked when psycho-pathological treatment is meted out to him. A human being cries for justice when he feels that the insensible act has crucified his self-respect," the bench, also comprising Justices A M Khanwilkar and D Y Chandrachud, said.

Welcoming the judgement, the former scientist said in Thiruvananthapuram that the Kerala police had "fabricated" the case and insisted that the technology he was accused to have stolen and sold in the 1994 case did not even exist at that time.

"The Supreme Court has clearly stated that it was an illegal arrest. It also identifies and acknowledges the suffering and humiliation I have gone through.

"The highest court of the country has accepted what I said. They (Kerala police) fabricated the case. The technology they said I stole and sold did not even exist then," he said responding to the order," he said.

The espionage case, which had hit the headlines in 1994, pertained to allegations of transfer of certain confidential documents on India's space programme to foreign countries by two scientists and four others, including two Maldivian women.

Narayanan had approached the apex court against a Kerala High Court judgement that no action needed to be taken against former DGP Siby Mathews, who was then heading the SIT probe team as IGP, and two retired superintendents of police K K Joshua and S Vijayan, who were later held responsible by the CBI for the scientist's illegal arrest.

Today, while awarding Rs 50 lakh compensation to be paid by the state government in eight weeks, the top court said this was being given to compensate for his suffering, anxiety and the treatment meted out to him.

It also allowed him to simultaneously pursue his pending civil suit for further compensation.

The bench said the "reputation of an individual is an insegregable facet of his right to life with dignity" and rejected the plea of Kerala government that due to the lapse of time no inquiry and subsequent actions needed to be taken against erring officials.

It accepted Narayanan's plea that the authorities who were responsible to cause such a "harrowing effect" on his mind, should face the "legal consequences".

"We think that the obtaining factual scenario calls for constitution of a Committee to find out ways and means to take appropriate steps against the erring officials," the bench said.

It ordered setting up of a three-member committee headed by its former judge Justice D K Jain to take appropriate steps against the erring officials and directed the Centre and the state Government to nominate one officer each in the panel. The seat of the committee would be in New Delhi.

"The criminal law was set in motion without any basis. It was initiated, if one is allowed to say, on some kind of fancy or notion," the bench said.

"We are of the view that the appellant was arrested and he has suffered custody for almost fifty days. His arrest has been seriously criticised in the closure report of the CBI. From the aforesaid report, the harassment and mental torture faced by the appellant is obvious," the bench said.

The bench said the "entire prosecution" initiated by the state police was "malicious and it has caused tremendous harassment and immeasurable anguish" to Narayanan. "It can be stated with certitude" that the fundamental right of life and personal liberty of Naryanan was "gravely affected".

The CBI, while giving clean chit to the scientist, had said that Siby Mathews had left "the entire investigation to IB surrendering his duties" and ordered indiscriminate arrest of the scientist and others without adequate evidence being on record. 

IDhar UDHAR

Iddhar Udhar