The investigation into the alleged rape case at the Indian Institute of Management-Calcutta (IIM-C) has uncovered several troubling details and contradictions. The accused, identified as Mahaveer Toppannavar, a second-year student, admitted to police that he had purchased sleeping pills from a nearby pharmacy and used them to spike cold drinks and water offered to the woman, who had visited him for counselling. However, police officials have noted inconsistencies in his statements, especially regarding why he drugged the woman, a point he has not clarified.
Circumstantial evidence indicates that after consuming the spiked beverage, the woman went to a room in the boys' hostel where the alleged assault occurred. According to investigators, the accused later called a friend and recounted what had happened while standing outside the room.
The case has been further complicated by conflicting statements. The survivor, who initially claimed to be a psychologist, has so far failed to provide documents to verify her qualifications or professional details. Adding to the confusion, the victim’s father has publicly disputed the initial complaint, stating that his daughter lost consciousness after falling from a vehicle rather than being assaulted, and alleging that police pressured them into filing the complaint. Authorities are also investigating whether external influences or financial motives may have led to the family’s changing narrative.
To establish the facts, a nine-member Special Investigation Team (SIT) led by an assistant commissioner has been formed. Police have collected forensic evidence, including food samples and CCTV footage from the campus. The accused remains in custody until July 19, as the investigation continues under close scrutiny.