The traumatising phase of divorce

The Supreme Court on Monday held that it can dissolve marriages on the ground of ‘irretrievable breakdown of marriage’ invoking special powers under Article 142. It further held that the mandatory waiting period of six months for divorce through mutual consent can be done away with, subject to conditions. Couples in Goa who have been through divorce are happy with the rule as they feel the process is too emotionally draining
The traumatising phase of divorce
Published on

On May 1, a bench of five judges passed the judgement in the matter of Shilpa Sailesh Vs Varun Sreenivasan, held that Supreme Court can exercise power under Article 142(1) of the Constitution, in view of the settlement between the parties, and grant a decre of divorce by mutual consent dispensing with the period and the procedure prescribed under Section 13-B of the Hindu Marriage Act. A divorce is a difficult phase for families especially when children are involved.

Speaking only on condition of anonymity, a mother of a teenage daughter says that she went through a year of waiting period till her divorce was finalised. “It was a mutual consent divorce but the conditions are so stressful for such a long waiting period. You have to be very careful as you have been through so many fights already and now over this waiting period, you don’t want to trigger the other person to withdraw the divorce. It’s like walking on eggshells just to get through the divorce, it is very traumatising. Having a child dealing through all of this is even more difficult. While it was absolutely traumatising for me till I got the divorce, the whole process was smooth sailing. I got the primary custody of my daughter and he has the visitation rights. However, since she is grown up now, she is free to decide when she wants to visit him. Over that one year, I had to have a casual conversation but now I no longer keep in touch with him,” she informs.

What does she feel about the Supreme Court rules it can directly grant divorce to couples under Article 142? “I am very happy about the rule as I was the one who initiated my divorce. My divorce was ten years back but I am glad that the Supreme Court’s discretion of exercising the plenary power it commands under Article 142 of the Constitution to dissolve a marriage on the ground of ‘Irretrievable break-down’.”

Campal based Armando Gonsalves is in all praise for the rule by the Supreme Court. He feels that it is very good that divorce can be granted quickly without wasting years in the process. He is divorced from his first wife with whom he has a daughter and son. Now, happily married with his second wife and blessed with two sons, he feels that divorce is not a taboo anymore. “It is all about your faith and trust in God. Divorce is one of the ugliest things that one endures, especially if you have children in the marriage. Divorce should never be there but that is our reality. I was married in 1994 and the divorce was filed years later because of the children, as they were too young. However, I still didn’t succeed in making it easy for them and it is better to deal with it quicker without much of an emotional baggage. Wasting years over it doesn’t really better for both parties,” says Armando.

He further adds, “Now my wife and two sons get along well with my daughter. She works in Goa for a Swiss company and though she lives with her maternal grandfather, she is always visiting us and regularly playing the boys. It is a wonderful experience and though my wife is her step-mother, they both are just like great friends. I think India and Goa has changed dramatically over the years and it is important to understand that divorce is not a taboo at all. I am glad that the Supreme Court rules that marriages can be dissolved on grounds of irretrievable breakdown. There are situations that can’t be controlled and it is best to move on and the sooner the better.”

Simran was stuck in an unsuccessful marriage for over 28 years just to keep her daughter safe and believing in the sacrament of being true to your spouse in good times and in bad, in sickness and in health. Being the eldest in the family among her siblings, she was married to her high school sweetheart, only to learn about his true colours a few years after their marriage when she had a small baby girl in her arms. She shares her experience as living through hell. “Two years after my marriage, I started receiving the worst treatment from my husband and my mother-in-law. Within four years of my marriage, I realised that my husband was a womanizer who was dating other women. He lied to me and troubled me which even landed me in the ICU. I lived through hell with him before even dying. I did my best to save my marriage, I kept up with him for so many years, as I wanted my daughter to get married and I didn’t want my divorce affecting her,” says Simran.

Her parents have been happily married for almost half a century and Simran always prayed to see better days. Unfortunately, her husband didn’t want to keep up with the charade. “From the outside, I had to put up with a face and even my parents and family didn’t know what I was going through. We lived abroad most of our married life but it did make matters worse. I did save money to build my own house and after building up enough courage, I decided to file for divorce. Thankfully, I had a wonderful lawyer, who was always supportive of me. I am now a happy grandmother of two babies and I have closed the chapter of my past. Living alone is a better life than thinking about your husband’s whereabouts,” she adds.

Now living an independent life, Simran hopes to inspire other women to look beyond their misery. “I would advise women not to sacrifice themselves because of others. Nobody can destroy you but yourself. Divorce is not the end but just a bend and it is not going to put you down and even the society is changing to accept divorcees. There is nothing more devastating than losing out on good years that you could have used to bloom yourself into a confident being,” says Simran.

Adv Sybil Fernandes who practices family law has dealt with many divorce cases in her career and has even seen partners coming out of their divorce and getting married and living a new happy marital life. “The trend is not on looking down on a person who is going through or is divorced. On the contrary, there are upheld as strong individuals you stood up for themselves. It is not a shame to get a divorce as now both partners are equal. During the Covid-19 lockdown, there were many domestic disputes which led to a boom in divorces being filed when the courts were opened. Spouses had to live together 24/7, when they were caught for extra-marital affairs or they couldn’t get along together till they reached the point that they filed for divorce. It was also the opposite for couples who got to spend quality time together and it triggered a baby boom,” says Sybil.

She further adds, “It is better not to have a marriage if any of the partners are not happy. They should check their compatibility as marriage is bringing not just two individuals but two families together. One can file for divorce only after three years of marriage. That is the reason many couples are advised to wait for three years before having a baby. Now, however, divorce is no longer considered a shame and most couples prefer to be on talking terms as they have to juggle the children between both the households. I have still not read through the ruling as it was just out yesterday. Right now it is very vague and lawyers will have to file for petitions for clarifications.”

Adv Jatin Ramaiya says, “The judgement rendered by the apex court is erudite. However, it’s more likely to affect the fundamental principle of hierarchy of courts flooding the Supreme Court with thousands if not lakhs of similar petition. A legislative amendment or Fast tracking the procedure before family courts would have been better solution in my opinion.”

Herald Goa
www.heraldgoa.in