Emile Durkheim, whose study is still considered the most influential for more than 100 years posited that, suicide cannot simply be explained by individual psychological problems-otherwise suicide rates would be static. Therefore, the need to critically analyse the trends, behind the disturbing behaviour in Goa. On observing macro trends in suicides, Durkheim’s explanation seems plausible that suicides as a social phenomenon are linked to integration, or the extent to which people feel attachment to society, and regulation, or the degree of external controls on people. Durkheim’s four-fold typology explains suicides around these two social facts ~ Egoistic suicide which result from a lack of integration, loneliness and alienation from a group, peers or family results in suicide; altruistic suicide which results from too much integration with a deviant group of maybe peers; anomic suicide which results from too little regulation and freedom bordering on licence; and fatalistic suicide which result from too much regulation from domineering authority or parents. Though these explanations are contested, the necessity to have authentic studies on rising trends in all suicides, but especially among the youth is exigent, given Goa’s rising economic prosperity, decline from traditional and family values and alienation faced by individuals vis-a-vis society, so as to look for credible measures to arrest the disturbing trend and prevent loss of especially precious young lives.