Who is Neha Singh? Galgotias professor marks ‘Open to Work’ on LinkedIn after robodog row

Noida-based Galgotias University exited the India AI Impact Summit after a controversy erupted over a robotic dog showcased at its pavilion. The row intensified when Professor Neha Singh, who introduced the machine, updated her LinkedIn status to “Open to Work,” drawing further public attention.

The issue began after a viral video showed Singh presenting the robotic dog, named “Orion,” as being developed by the university’s Centre of Excellence. Critics soon alleged that the robot was actually the Unitree Go2, manufactured by China-based Unitree Robotics, and not an indigenous innovation. The development triggered sharp online criticism and questions over attribution.

- Advertisement -

Add as preferred source on Google

If you enjoyed reading this article, you can help support our journalism by adding OHeraldo as a preferred source.

Who is Neha Singh

WhatsApp Image 2026 02 19 at 9.35.25 AM 2026 02 505b81353569e38dbddf0e75190b9e8e

Singh’s LinkedIn bio highlighted her focus on communication and personality development. She wrote that communication was “more than just a skill” and described her strength as helping learners express themselves with clarity and confidence. She also emphasised her ability to connect, inspire and guide individuals at different stages of learning.

Responding to the backlash, Singh said there was no intention to mislead. She attributed the controversy to “enthusiasm and unclear expression,” adding that her remarks may not have been articulated properly in the moment. She expressed regret over how the presentation was interpreted.

Meanwhile, Galgotias University issued multiple clarifications. The institution maintained that it never claimed to have built the robotic dog and that the device was purchased purely for academic demonstration and AI training purposes. In a later statement, the university apologised, saying its representative had provided “factually incorrect information” in haste and without authorisation.

The episode has since sparked a wider debate on transparency, attribution and responsible showcasing of emerging technologies at public forums.

- Advertisement -
Share This Article