CS Krishnamurthy
In 2018, I heard the story of Dr Suresh (name changed), a retired professor from Bangalore. For over thirty years, he had earned the community’s respect for his academic contributions.
If you enjoyed reading this article, you can help support our journalism by adding OHeraldo as a preferred source.
After retiring, he invested his life savings in a corporate bond scheme promoted by a charismatic CEO. The scheme seemed secure, but within two years, the company collapsed. It wasn’t due to market forces or economic turmoil -it was a deliberate fraud.
The professor, devastated, lamented: “All those years of saving, wiped out, because I believed their promises.” His wealth wasn’t stolen by a masked man but by a CEO in a well-tailored suit behind an office desk.
As a child, I imagined thieves as comical figures – black-and-white striped shirts, masks, and sacks filled with stolen goods -a classic image borrowed from children’s stories. They were portrayed sneaking through dark alleys, break open windows, and stealing whatever they could grab. Theft back then seemed ‘straightforward’ -a crime committed with stealth, often at the risk of being caught red-handed.
But as I grew older, I saw that theft had evolved. Instead of creeping through the night, today’s thief operated in the daylight. Instead of a crowbar, he wielded complex documents and the power of persuasive language.
He wore not stripes, but a suit and tie, and his actions affected not one household, but thousands. Theft has shifted from physical to the psychological -a game of deception that relied on trust, and influence.
As we think of Mahatma Gandhi, the champion of non-violence, it’s ironic to think of how crime itself has also become largely non-violent. White-collar crime has replaced violence with manipulation, and they relied on their ability to exploit complex systems. “White-collar crime,” they call it -a sophisticated act carried out with an air of respectability. Instead of breaking into homes, these criminals break trust and life savings.
They often don’t look like the stereotypical thieves. They are educated, influential, and respected members of society. Their weapons aren’t guns or crowbars, but financial statements, insider information, and complex legal structures. Figures like Bernie Madoff and Enron’s executives are prime examples of this new breed -individuals who can steal millions without ever stepping outside their plush offices.
Victims, like Dr Suresh, often feel a profound sense of betrayal, as if the system itself had conspired against them. The loss isn’t just financial; it’s emotional and psychological.
A neighbour who lost his savings in a similar scandal put it best: “They stole my peace of mind, and they did it with a smile.” The damage is hidden, leaving victims struggling with a loss that appears only as a set of numbers on their account statements.
What makes these modern thieves particularly dangerous is their subtlety. Unlike traditional burglars, who leave clear evidence of their intrusion, white-collar criminals work behind closed doors, shielded by complex financial jargon and legal loopholes.
They’re sitting in boardrooms, shaking hands, and appearing on magazine covers. Their crimes are difficult to detect because they blend in, cloaked in a veneer of legitimacy.
Thieves of the past were easy to recognise. There was a clear distinction between right and wrong. But today’s white-collar criminals blur these lines, making it harder to distinguish between what is legal and what is moral. They exploit loopholes, manipulate systems, and use their influence to evade justice. Their actions can destroy lives, wipe out pensions, and even destabilise economies.
“The greatest trick the devil ever pulled was convincing the world he didn’t exist,” the saying goes. The most dangerous aspect of these modern criminals is their ability to make their theft appear as part of the ordinary course of business. They’ve convinced the world that their success is legitimate, and their wealth well-earned. In reality, they’ve taken what doesn’t belong to them -not with force, but with finesse.
