Nuclear Liability Bill embroiled in new row

Nuclear Liability Bill embroiled in new row
PTI
NEW DELHI, AUG 19
The Nuclear Liability Bill was today embroiled in a fresh row with the Bharatiya Janata Party(BJP) and Left objecting to an amendment proposed by a parliamentary panel on suppliers’ obligation in case of an accident but the government sought to allay the apprehensions of opposition parties.
The Union cabinet meeting scheduled to consider the bill was postponed till tomorrow, apparently to consider the objections raised by the opposition.
BJP and Left parties raised objections to addition of a word ‘and’ in the Clause 17 which says that “The operator of a nuclear installation shall have a right to recourse where — (A) such right is expressly provided for in a contract in writing”.
The parties fear that insertion of the word dilutes the obligations on the suppliers of equipment in case of a nuclear accident.
The government, on its part, sought to allay apprehensions over the recommendations of the standing committee, saying all concerns would be addressed.
 “I assure my friends in BJP and Left that we have already taken their concerns on board. If there are any concerns, there are some concerns that have been raised today, all those concerns will be addressed in all seriousness,” Minister of State Prithviraj Chavan told reporters.
 “Wait till the amendments are brought to parliament,” he said when his attention was drawn to objections raised over the amendments.
 The report of standing committee on science and technology, which examined the Civil Liability for Nuclear Damages Bill 2010, proposed that the Clause 17(A) may end with word ‘and’.
It also proposed modification of Clause 17(b) to say “the nuclear incident has resulted as a consequence of latent or patent defect, supply of sub-standard material, defective equipment or services or from the gross negligence on the part of the supplier of the material, equipment or services”.
BJP, which had agreed with Congress on changes in the bill, shot off a note to the government, saying clubbing of Clause 17(A) and (B) dilutes provisions relating to the liability of suppliers.