Making our vote a surgical strike for Goa

Future has a past. The way the past will unfold is depended on the way the present is handled by multiple players. There is much complexity involved in the unfolding of the future. The destiny of the future largely remains open and  undecided.  The fact that past has a future is taught by the theory of Karma in our country.  The past somehow determines the future.  Somewhere, famous German thinker Martin Heidegger has written ‘higher than actuality is possibility’.  There is a future direction of the past as well as past sedimentation in the future. Thinking within this framework, some critical questions arise:   How can we discern the future of our past in the context of the political formations in Goa?  Where is the future heading us? Can we interrupt its path?  It will all depend  on how we Goans respond to the political initiatives of all parties in the fray. If we stay passive or remain uncritical and unreflective, we stand the danger of being led astray by vested interests that will de-goanize Goa and Goans. Hence, a lot rests with the people of Goa and they have a lot at stake regarding the future of Goa and Goans.  In response to this great responsibility, we need to actively engage all who claim to give a promised future. We have to watchful as most political parties promise the sun while they fail to deliver even the moon.  The political parties create interest in us that they claim to represent and hence, we need to access, weigh and discern our options that will enable us to give ourselves and all Goans a future that we all deserve.
The issue about the future of Goa and Goans requires our critical consideration. May be it raises several questions. Does Goa and Goans  have  a future at all? Does the emerging scenario is drifting towards a future that has no prime space for Goans and Goa?  Will Goa fade into the ocean of de-goanization? Can we reverse this de-Goanization?  These and other uneasy questions are haunting us today more than ever before. The way the future is approaching us appears that it wants to come without giving us a future. It is painful to imagine a future in Goa without Goans  but it appears to be our inevitable fate.  To interrupt, disrupt and reverse this process we have to unite move beyond petty consideration and stand up for Goa and Goans. The future that we want to give ourselves is still in our hands. Among several discomforting decisions, we will have to take hard political decisions. Our vote has to be used as a surgical strike. Thankfully, we have several choices to make an informed decision on the political front. But there is a catch twenty two situation. The fact of the choices that we enjoy can scatter and splinter our votes and the political forces that have already ruined our present may have a new lease of life in the coming future.  If this scenario becomes a reality, we shall cut the branch of the tree on which we are sitting. Hence, we need a new leap of consciousness that will put primacy of Goa, Goan-ness and Goans ahead of every other consideration. We seem to have arrived at a do or die situation and what we do will decide what future we create for Goa and Goans.
Dr. Tristao Cunha Braganza portrayed colonization as de-nationalisation of all Goans. What can we say about post-colonial Goa? Perhaps, it would be more aptly described as an era of de-goanization.  If colonisation was de-nationalisation, postcolonial period has become an age of de-goanization. The de-goanization process has accelerated on an exponential scale. If Goans are caught napping this time, it will prove fatal for us all.  We still have our time to get our act together. In this context, we have to understand that the future that we wish to give ourselves is intertwined with the future that we give to the political formations that are unfolding on the horizons. Do we wish to put our future in the hands of the tried and tested masters who have jeopardized our life for their selfish interests? Do we wish to depend on leaders who seem to have reached the finishing line of their political shelf life? Do we want to trust the energy and dynamism of the new young brigade?  We have to make hard choices. We need to discern critically what is posing as our interest is not a masked self interest.
(The author is Professor of achol Seminary)

Share This Article