The protest, led by state convenor Viraj Desai, was sparked by Bhembre’s video on Chhatrapati Shivaji Maharaj, which has since created considerable debate. While Bhembre’s video sought to shed light on Shivaji Maharaj’s legacy, it was met with strong opposition from some groups, including Bajrang Dal, who accused him of undermining the revered historical figure.
The protest outside Bhembre’s home has ignited a wave of support for the writer from the local community and his well-wishers. A large number of people have been visiting his residence, voicing their solidarity and condemning the manner in which the Bajrang Dal group has treated him and his family. Visitors have expressed their concerns not only about the protest but also about the false accusations leveled against Bhembre, particularly the claims that he is sympathetic towards the Portuguese during India’s freedom struggle. This claim, made by the protesters, has caused further outrage, as Bhembre is the son of a renowned freedom fighter who dedicated his life to India’s independence.
If you enjoyed reading this article, you can help support our journalism by adding OHeraldo as a preferred source.
The accusations of Bhembre being “pro-Portuguese” have left many locals baffled, given his father’s involvement in the freedom movement. For many, it is an outright attempt to tarnish the reputation of an individual who has contributed significantly to the cultural and historical discourse in Goa. The public outcry over these accusations has only strengthened the support for Bhembre, who has always stood firm in his stance on preserving Goan heritage and history, independent of any colonial influence.
However, the most troubling aspect of the incident has been the reported intimidation of Bhembre and his wife the night before the protest. According to sources close to the family, the Bajrang Dal group allegedly resorted to intimidating tactics, creating an atmosphere of fear and uncertainty. This has been widely condemned by the local community, who believe that such acts of aggression and intimidation have no place in a civil society.
