A fresh petition has emerged in the ongoing divorce proceedings between Tamil actor-politician Vijay and his wife Sangeetha Sornalingam. In the latest filing, Sangeetha has sought residential protection and financial relief while the legal battle continues in court.
Sangeetha, 51, who is a United Kingdom citizen, has stated in the petition that she currently does not own a residence in India. Because of this, she has requested the court to allow her to continue staying in their matrimonial home or direct Vijay to provide alternative accommodation.
Demand for Residence and Financial Support
In the application submitted before the court, Sangeetha has asked that she be permitted to stay in the matrimonial home until Vijay provides “equivalent alternative accommodation befitting his status.” The petition argues that denying her residence during the proceedings could leave her without a place to stay in India.
Along with residential protection, the petition also seeks the “payment of fair and reasonable permanent alimony.” By requesting these orders, Sangeetha aims to ensure financial stability and accommodation while the court continues hearing the divorce case.
Allegations and Background of the Divorce
The latest development comes after Sangeetha earlier filed for divorce from Vijay after 26 years of marriage. The couple, who married in August 1999, have two children – Jason Sanjay and Divya Shasha.
According to the earlier petition, Sangeetha alleged that Vijay was involved in an extramarital relationship with a female actor. She claimed she discovered the alleged relationship in 2021 and that despite assurances that it would end, the association allegedly continued.
The petition also stated that Vijay began excluding her from social and professional events and was seen attending functions and travelling abroad with the said actor. Sangeetha claimed these incidents caused humiliation to her and their children.
What Happens Next
Sangeetha has cited adultery and cruelty as grounds for divorce under the Special Marriage Act, 1954. The case is currently being heard in a district court, and the outcome will depend on the court’s findings after examining the evidence presented by both sides.

