Kashinath Shetye Demands FIR Against Goa University VC, Registrar After Assistant Professor Indicted

Kashinath Shetye, one of the original complainants in the Goa University exam paper leak case, has issued a sharp statement following new developments in the investigation. Shetye confirmed that the university’s Inquiry Committee has submitted its detailed findings to the Executive Council for further action.

According to Shetye, the committee has found Assistant Professor Pranav Naik—formerly with the School of Physical & Applied Sciences—guilty of multiple serious violations. The report alleges that Dr. Naik created duplicate keys to gain unauthorized access to sensitive university areas, stole confidential examination question papers, and allegedly visited a female student’s residence in connection with the leak. These conclusions, Shetye says, are supported by documentary evidence, witness accounts, and material seized during the probe. Naik now faces criminal charges under the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, including forgery, housebreaking, cheating, and criminal trespass.

- Advertisement -

Add as preferred source on Google

If you enjoyed reading this article, you can help support our journalism by adding OHeraldo as a preferred source.

Shetye, however, insists that accountability must go further. He has called for a broader probe targeting top university officials, specifically Vice Chancellor Harilal Menon and the Registrar, whom he accuses of deliberately attempting to suppress crucial information. Alleging dereliction of duty and abetment, Shetye has demanded that an FIR be registered against them.

Echoing the growing public outcry from student bodies and civil society, Shetye stressed that without action against those who allegedly covered up the scandal, the credibility of the university administration will remain in question. He warned that failure to act decisively would erode academic integrity and damage public trust in Goa University’s leadership.

All eyes are now on the Executive Council, which is expected to review the report and determine the next steps, including potential disciplinary and legal action against all individuals named in the findings.

- Advertisement -
Share This Article