Citizens across Goa have continued to voice strong objections to the proposed Foreign Contribution (Regulation) Amendment Bill, 2026, amid concerns over its impact on civil society or ganisations and minority rights. Representations and statements from various groups and individuals have reportedly been sub mitted to authorities, urg ing reconsideration of the proposed legislation. Citizens have expressed apprehension that the amendments could weaken constitutional safeguards for minority communities, particularly citing powers proposed for the designat ed authority (DA), which critics say may exercise ex tensive control over assets derived from foreign con tributions, including their management, transfer and disposal. “Many organisations depend on foreign con tributions to run schools, hospitals, and social pro grammes. If these provi sions are implemented without safeguards, it could disrupt essential services,” said Christopher Dias.
Another concern relates to provisions under which an organisation’s regis tration may be treated as ceased if renewal is not ap plied for or is denied, allow ing assets to be transferred to government bodies, with proceeds credited to the Consolidated Fund of India. Citizens fear this could en able arbitrary control over institutional assets. “A lack of clarity in the law and excessive powers to authorities could lead to misuse. There must be proper checks and balanc es,” said Peter Menezes, a Margao-based legal profes sional. Objections have also been raised over provisions granting broad powers of inspection and oversight of accounts and activities, which critics argue could infringe on rights under Ar ticle 26 of the Constitution. “We are not against reg ulation, but it must be fair and transparent. The current draft creates un certainty and fear among genuine charitable organi sations,” said Mariano Fer nandes, a representative of a local NGO.
If you enjoyed reading this article, you can help support our journalism by adding OHeraldo as a preferred source.
Concerns have further been raised over ambigu ities in defining entities barred from receiving for eign contributions, as well as unclear provisions relat ed to appeals and exemp tions. Several voices across the state have warned that the bill, in its current form, could adversely affect insti tutions engaged in educa tion, healthcare and social services, and have a chilling effect on legitimate charita ble work. Calling for wider consul tation, citizens have urged the government to with draw or amend the bill. “The government should engage with stakeholders and ensure that constitu tional freedoms are not compromised,” said anoth er concerned citizen.
